Valuation of complex environmental goods: A multi-criteria approach

José A. Gómez-Limón, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé

Abstract

Economic valuation of complex environmental goods has several issues still opened to debate. This paper focuses on two of these aspects; linearity of attributes in the valuation function and individual utility function heterogeneity. A methodological approach based on Multi-attribute Utility Theory is proposed which allows to contrast the impact of these concerns on environmental good  valuation. We apply the proposed methodology to value a protected natural in the province of Granada (Spain). From the results obtained we can conclude that attribute non-linearity and individual utility function’s heterogeneity are relevant aspects to be taken into account in environmental valuation.


Keywords

Complex environmental goods; heterogeneity; attribute non-linearity; multiattributeutility; valuation

Subject classification

Q15, Q18, Q25.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adamowicz, W. (1995). «Alternative valuation techniques:a comparison and movement to synthesis». En: Willis, K. y Corkindale, J. (Eds.) Environmental Valuation: New Perspectives. CAB International, Oxon (Reino Unido), pp. 144-159.

Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J. y Williams, M. (1994). «Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities». Southern Economic Journal, 55(3):728-742. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017

Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Boxall, P., Louviere, J. y Williams, M. (1997). «Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1):65-84. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0957

Adamowicz, W. (2004). «What’s it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation». Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 48(3):419-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00258.x

Álvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Wright, R. y Macmillan, D. (1999). «Estimating the benefits of agri-environmental policy: Econometric issues in open-ended contingent valuation studies ». Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(1):23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640569911280

Amador, F., Sumpsi, J.M. y Romero, C. (1998). «A non-interactive methodology to assess farmers’ utility functions: an application to large farms in Andalusia, Spain». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 25:92-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/25.1.92

Azqueta, D. (1994). Valoración Económica de la Calidad Ambiental. McGraw-Hill, Madrid.

Ballestero, E. y Romero, C. (1998). Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economic problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2827-9

Barreiro, J. y Pérez y Pérez, L. (1999). «Non-market benefits valuation of conservation policies in Spain». Medit: Revista di Economia, Agricoltora e Ambiente, 9(1):4-13.

Barreiro, J., Casado, J.M. y Pérez y Pérez, L. (2005). Incorporating uncertainty and cero values into the valuation of protected areas and species. XI Congreso Europeo de Economía Agraria, Copenhague.

Bateman, I., Carson, R., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D., Sugden, R. y Swanson, J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques, A Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009727

Baucells, M. y Sarin, R.K. (2003). «Group decisions with multiple criteria». Management Science, 49:1105-1118. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.8.1105.16400

Bennett, J. y Blamey, R. (Eds.) (2001). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar publishing, Massachusetts.

Bodily, S.E. (1979). «A delegation process for combining individual utility functions». Management Science, 25:1035-1041. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.10.1035

Boxall, P. y Adamowicz, W. (2002). «Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach». Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4):421-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619

Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W., Swait, J., Williams, M. y Louviere, J. (1996). «A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation». Ecological Economics, 18(3):243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0

Carson, R. y Groves, T. (2007). «Incentive and informational properties of preference questions». Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1):181-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5

Carson, R., Flores, N. y Meade, N. (2001). «Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidences». Environmental and Resource Economics, 19:173-210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011128332243

Champ, P. y Bishop, R. (2006). «Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format». Land Economics, 82(2):162-173. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.82.2.162

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. y Ferguson, R. (1955). «Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming». Management Science, 1:138-151. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1.2.138

CMA, Consejería de Medio Ambiente (sin fecha). NATURA 2000. Formulario normalizado de datos para zonas de especial protección para las aves (ZEPA) para lugares susceptibles de identificación como lugares de importancia comunitaria (LIC) y para zonas de especial conservación (ZEC). [www.cma.junta-andalucia.es/medioambiente/natura/ficheros_lics/es6140004.pdf]. Consultado el 23-01-2007.

Cook, W.D., Kress, M. y Seiford, L.M. (1996). «A general framework for distance-based consensus in ordinal ranking models». European Journal of Operational Research, 96(3):392-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00322-3

Cummings, R. y Taylor, L. (1999). «Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method». American Economic Review, 89:649-665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649

Dielman, T.E. (2005). «Least absolute value regression: Recent contributions». Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 75:263-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0094965042000223680

Edwards, W. (1977). «Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making». En: Bell, D.E., Keeney, R.L. y Raiffa, H. (Eds.) Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Elian, S.N., Andre, C.D.S. y Naruda, S.C. (2000). «Influence measure for l1 regression». Communications in Statistic-Theory and Methods, 29:837-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920008832518

Elorrieta, I. y Castellano, E. (1999). La valoración económica de la biodiversidad. Monetización de los valores de no-uso:biológico y de conservación. Congreso de Ordenación y Gestión Sostenible de Montes, Santiago de Compostela.

ESPARC (2005). Anuario EUROPARC-España del estado de los espacios naturales protegidos. Fundación Fernando González Bernáldez, Madrid.

Foster, V. y Mourato, S. (2003). «Elicitation format and sensitivity to scope. Do contingent valuation and choice experiment give the same results?» Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(2):141-160. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022856329552

Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R. y Duckstein, L. (1982). Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

González-Pachón, J. y Romero, C. (1999). «Distance-based consensus methods: A goal programming approach». OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 27:341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00052-8

González-Pachón, J. y Romero, C. (2005). «An analytical framework for aggregating multiattribute utility functions». Journal of the Operational Research Society, 15(1):1-7.

Gregory, R y Slovic, P. (1997). «A constructive approach to environmental valuation». Ecological Economics, 21(3):175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00104-8

Hanley, N., Ryan, M. y Wright, R. (2003). «Estimating the monetary value of health care: Lessons from environmental economics». Health Economics, 12(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.763

Hanley, N., Wright, R. y Adamowicz, V. (1998). «Using choice experiments to value the environment ». Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4):413-428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008287310583

Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M. y Greene, W.H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610356

Hoehn, J. (1991). «Valuing the multidimensional impacts of environmental policy: Theory and methods». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(2):289-299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242713

Hoehn, J. y Randall, A. (1989). «Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test». American Economic Review, 79(3):544-551.

Hoehn, J.P. y Loomis, J. (1993). «Substitution effects in the contingent valuation of multiple environmental programs». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1):56-75. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1993.1026

Hu, W., Hünnemeyer, A., Veeman, M., Adamowicz, A. y Srivastava, L. (2004). «Trading off health, environment and genetic modification attributes in food». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3):389-408. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.3.389

Ignizio, J.P. y Cavalier, T.M. (1994). Linear Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Kallas, Z., Gómez-Limón, J.A. y Barreiro, J. (2007). «Decomposition of the aggregated value of agricultural multifunctionality: combining contingent valuation and the analytic hierarchy process». Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(2):218-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00085.x

Keeney, R.L. (1976). «A group reference axiomatization with cardinal utility». Management Science, 23:140-145. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.2.140

Keeney, R.L. y Kirkwood, C.W. (1975). «Group decision making using cardinal social welfare functions». Management Science, 22:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.22.4.430

Keeney, R.L. y Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade Offs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (publicación original, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174084

Lancaster, K. (1966). «A new approach to consumer theory». Journal of Political Economy, 74:132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. Columbia University Press, New York.

List, J. (2001). «Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sports cards». American Economic Review, 91:1498-1507. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1498

Louviere, J. (2001). «Choice experiments: An overview of concepts and issues». En:Bennett, J. y Blamey, R. (Eds.) The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Edward Elgar publishing, Massachusetts, pp. 13-36.

Louviere, J., Hensher, D. y Swait, J. (2000). Stated choice models methods:Analysis and applications in Marketing, transportation and environmental valuation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831

Lusk, J. (2003). «Effects of cheap-talk on consumer’s willingness to pay for Golden Rice». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4):840-856. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00492

Ma, C. y Stern, D. (2006). «Environmental and ecological economics:A citation analysis». Ecological Economics, 58(3):491-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.023

Madden, P. (1991). «A generzalization of Hicksian q substitutes and complements with application to demand rationing». Econometrica, 59:1497-1508. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938377

McMillan, D., Philip, L., Hanley, N. y Álvarez-Farizo, B. (2003). «Valuing non-market benefits of wild goose conservation:a comparison of interview and group-based approaches». Ecological Economics, 43(1):49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00182-9

Milon, W. y Scorgin, D. (2006). «Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration ». Ecological Economics, 56(2):162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.009

Mogas, J., Riera, P. y Bennet, J. (2006). «A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions». Journal of Forest Economics, 12(1):5-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2005.11.001

Nakayama, H., Tanino, T., Matsumoto, K., Matsuo, H., Inoue, K. y Sawaragi, Y. (1979). «Methodology for group decision support with an application to assessment of residential environment». En: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) (Ed.) IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-9. IEEE, New York:477-485. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310273

Narula, S.C. y Wellington, J.F. (2007). «Multiple criteria linear regression». European Journal of Operational Research, 181:767-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.026

Randall, A. y Hoehn, J. (1996). «Embedding in market demand systems». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3):369-380. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0025

Rigby, D. y Burton, M. (2003). Capturing preference heterogeneity in stated choice models: a random parameter logit model of the demand for GM food. Discussion paper series nº 0319, School of Economics Studies, The University of Manchester.

Romero, C. (1991). Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

Romero, C. (1996). «Multicriteria analysis and environmental economics: An approximation». European Journal of Operational Research, 96(1):81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00118-X

Romero, C. (2001). «Extended lexicographic goal programming: A unifying approach». OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 27(1):63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00026-8

Roulac, S., Dotzour, M., Cheng, P. y Webb, J. (2005). «Evolving Research Priorities: The Contents of Land Economics». Land Economics, 81(4):457-476. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.81.4.457

Russell, C., Dale, V., Lee. J., Jensen, M.H., Kane, M. y Gregory, R. (2001). «Experimenting with multi-attribute utility survey methods in a multi-dimensional valuation problem». Ecological Economics, 36(1):87-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00207-X

Ryan, M. (2004). «A comparison of stated preference methods for estimating monetary values». Health Economics, 13(3):291-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.818

Scarpa, R. (2000). «Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland: Comment». Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1):122-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01213.x

Scarpa, R., Ruto, E.S.K., Kristjanson, P., Radeny M., Drucker, A.G. y Rege, J.E.O. (2003). «Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates». Ecological Economics, 45(3):409-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00094-6

Sen, A. (1970). «The impossibility of a Paretian liberal». Journal of Political Economics, 78:152-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259614

Stevens, T., Belkner, R., Dennis, D., Kittredge, D. y Willis, C. (2000). «Comparison of contingent valuation and conjoint analysis in ecosystem management». Ecological Economics, 32(1):63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00071-3

Tamiz, M., Jones, D. y Romero, C. (1998). «Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art». European Journal of Operational Research, 111:569-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00317-2

Abstract Views

372
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2174-7350   ISSN: 1578-0732   https://doi.org/10.4995/earn