Social influence and sustainability in the use of renewable resources

Isabel Almudi, Julio Sánchez Chóliz


In this paper we present a model in which we show that if the withdrawal activities referring to a renewable resource are abusive, they generate a social reaction of some kind that changes the social preferences. This change is taken into account by the social planner in deciding the optimal allocation between consumption and stock of the resource. Given these new conditions we ask how the stock of the resource in the steady state changes and what can be deduced about the chance of overuse of the resource. At the same time we compare these results to the ones obtained with traditional models which did not take social reactions into account. The conclusions obtained show that with these new conditions the stock of the steady state increases and the economy behavior becomes more conservative, diminishing the chance of overuse of the resource.


Renewable Resources; Sustainability; Environmental Information; Overuse

Subject classification

Q50, Q20, C61.

Full Text:



Aidt, T.S. (1998). «Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy». Journal of Public Economics, 69:1-16.

Andreoni, J. (1988). «Privately Provided Public Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism». Journal of Public Economics, 35:57-73.

Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure Altruism and donation to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100:464-477.

Beltratti, A., Chichilnisky, G. y Heal, G.M. (1993). «Sustainable Growth and the Green Golden Rule. Goldin, I y Winters, L.A. (eds.)». Approaches to Sustainable Economic Development. Cambridge University Press.

Beltratti, A., Chichilnisky, G., y Heal, G.M. (1995). «The Green Golden Rule». Economic Letters, 49:175-179.

Beltratti, A ., Chichilnisky, G. y Heal, G.M. (1998). «Sustainable Use of Renewable Resources. Graciela Chichilnisky, Geoffrey Heal & Alessandro Vercelli (eds.)». Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Berck, P. (1981). «Optimal Management of Renewable Resources with Growing Demand and Stock Externalities». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8:105-117.

Bergstrom, T.C. (1995). «On the evolution of altruistic ethical rules for siblings». American Economic Review, 85:58-81.

Brown, L.R. (2001). Ecoeconomy. Norton.

Clark, C.W. (1973). «The Economics of Overexplotation». Science, 181:630-34.

Clark, C.W. (1990). Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Willey-Interscience.

Conconi, P. (2003). «Green lobbies and transboundary pollution in large open economies». Journal of International Economics, 59:399-422.

Conrad, K. (2005). «Price Competition and Product Differentiation When Consumers Care for the Environment». Environmental and Resource Economics, 31:1-19.

Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. Yale University Press.

Eriksson, C. (2004). «Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation? A differentiated products example». Resource and Energy Economics, 26:281-293.

Fredriksson, P. G. (1997). «The political economy of pollution taxes in a small open economy ». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 33:44-58.

Gordon, H.S. (1954). «The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery». Journal of Political Economy, 62:124-42.

Hayek, F. (1945). «The Use of knowledge in Society». American Economic Review, 35:519-530.

Hayek, F. (1948). Individualisim and economic Order. Gateway (eds). Blomington.

Heal, G. (1998). Valuing the Future. Economic Theory and Sustainability. Columbia Univerity Press.

Heal, G. (2001). Optimality or Sustainability. Eleventh Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Southampton, June 28th-30th.

Hillman, A. y Ursprung, H. (1992). «The influence of environmental concerns on the political determintion of international trade policy». Blackhurst, R., Anderson, K. (eds.). The Greening of World Trade Issues. Harvester Wheatcheaf.

Hillman, A. y Ursprung, H. (1994). «Environmental protection and international trade policy». Carraro, C. (eds.). The International Dimension of Environmental Policy. Kluwer.

Johansson, P.O. (1990). «Valuing environmental damage». Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6:34-50.

Krautkraemer, J.A. (1985). «Optimal Growth Resource Amenities and the Preservation of Natural Environments». Review of Economic Studies, 52:153-170.

Lafforgue, G. (2005). «Uncertainty and Amenity Values in Renewable Resource Economics». Environmental and Resource Economics, 31:369-383.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.

O’Rourke, D. (2004). «Market Movements: Nongovernmental Organization Strategies to Influence Global Production and Consumption». Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9:115-128.

Popp, D. (2001). «Altruism and the demand for environmental quality». Land Economics, 77:339-349.

Schaefer, M.B. (1954). «Some Aspects of the Dynamics of Populations Important to the Management of the Commercial Marine Fisheries». Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Bulletin, 1:25-56.

Schaefer, M. B. (1957). «Some Considerations of Population Dynamics and Economics in Relation to the Management of Marine Fisheries». Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 14:669-81.

Stigler, G.J. y Becker, G.S. (1977). «De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum». American Economic Review, 67(2):76-90.

Stiglitz, J. (1994). Whither Socialism? Cambridge Mass. MIT Press. Todd, E. y Ritchie, E. (2000). «Environmental non-governmental organizations and the common fisheries policy». Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 10:141-149.<141::AID-AQC404>3.0.CO;2-S

Takayama, A. (1994). Analytical methods in Economics. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Viladrich, M. (2004). «Las principales aportaciones a la teoría de la regulación medioambiental. Los últimos 40 años». Economía agraria y recursos naturales, 4(8):41-62.

Wapner, P. (1995). Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Suny.

Wirl, F. (1999). «Complex, dynamic environmental policies». Resource and Energy Economics, 21:19-41.

Wirl, F. (2004). «Thresholds in concave renewable resource models». Ecological Economics, 48:259-267.

Abstract Views

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

 Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2174-7350   ISSN: 1578-0732