Restoration strategies: using citizen’s juries choices for impact assessment

Begoña Álvarez-Farizo, José M. Gil, B.J. Howard

Abstract

Last years have brought a range of pollutant spills affecting natural, industrial, urban and rural areas. To mitigate the effects of pollutants it is necessary to adopt an integrated management of both productive and natural areas. However, to be effective, it is necessary to consider not only the health or biophysical effects of the countermeasures, but the response of the individuals to these changes. The aim of this study is on the assessment of the potential impacts, both social and environmental, derived from the implementation of restoration strategies due to spills. Our approach is based on a choice experiment applied in a context of a citizen’s jury in Cumbria (UK) and Zaragoza (Spain). The results highlight the advantages of this participatory techniques vs traditional survey.

Keywords

Choice Experiments; Citizen’s juries; Discrete Choice; Impact assessment; Restoration; remediation

Subject classification

Q51, Q52, Q53.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aldred, J. y Jacobs, M. (2000). «Citizens and wetlands: evaluating the Ely citizen’s jury». Ecological Economics, 34 (2):217-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00159-2

Álvarez-Farizo, B., Hanley, N., Barberán, R. y Lázaro, A. Valuing non-market benefits in valuation workshops: The choice of a citizen’s jury. Ecological Economics (en prensa, agosto 2006).

Álvarez-Farizo, B. y Gil, J.M., (2003). Valuing Side-Effects Associated With Countermeasures For Radioactive Contamination. Deliverable 7 of the Strategy Project.http://www.strategy-ec.org.uk/output/reports/D7_Valuation%20of%20cms.pdf.

Bennett, J. y Blamey, R. (2001). The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Blamey, R.K.; Bennett, J.W. y Louviere, J.J. (1996). A comparison of stated preference techniques for estimating environmental values. Choice Modelling Research Reports, no 1.

Blamey, R.K.; Rolfe, J.C. y Bennett, J.W. (1997). Environmental Choice Modelling: Issues and Qualitative Insights, «Choice Modelling Research Reports», n.° 4.

Bonano, E.J.; Apostolakis, G.E.; Salter, P.F.; Ghassemi, A. y Jennings, S. (2000). Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives. «Journal of Hazardous Materials» 71 (1-3):35-57 Sp. Iss. SI Jan 7 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00071-0

Bonnieux, F.; Daucé, P. y Rainelli, P. (1980). Impacts socio-économiques de la marée noire provenant de l’Amoco Cadiz, Rennes, Inra-UVLOE, rapport et annexes.

Bonnieux, F. y Le Goffe, P. (1997). Valuing the benefits of landscape restoration: a case study of the Cotentin in Lower Normandy, France. «Journal of Environmental Management», 50:312-333. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0127

Bonnieux, F. y Rainelli, P. (1991). Catastrophe écologique et dommages économiques: problèmes d’évaluation à partir de l’Amoco Cadiz, Inra, Economica, París.

Bonnieux, F. y Rainelli, P. (1993). Assessing marine resources damage and the clean-up cost of oil spills. The European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Fourth Conference June 30- July 3, Fontainebleau France.

Bonnieux, F. y Rainelli, P. (2001). L’évaluation des pertes d’aménité des pêcheurs à pied suite au naufrage de l’Erika, colloque Erika, Ifremer, Nantes, 6 noviembre.

Brans, E.H.P. y Uilhoorn, M. (2001). Liability for damage to natural resources. Background Paper for EU White Paper on Environmental Liability.

Brown, T., Peterson, G., Tonn, B., (1995) The values jury to aid natural resource decisions. Land Economics 71, (2): 250-260. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146505

Brown, T.; Barro, S.C.; Manfredo, M.J. y Peterson, G. (1995). «Does better information about the good avoid the embedding effect». Journal of Environmental Management, 44:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1995.0026

Burgess, L. y Street, D. (2004). «Optimal designs for asymmetric choice experiments». Cen- SoC Working Paper, No. 04-004. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.

Carson, R.; Mitchell, R.; Hanemann, W.; Kopp, R., Presser, S. y Ruud, P. (1992). A contingent valuation study of lost passive use values resulting from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. A report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, November.

Carson, R. y Hanemann, W. (1992). A preliminary economic analysis of recreational fishing losses related to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. A report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska.

Gómez, C.; Nova, F.J. y Paniagua, A. (1999). Actitudes y comportamientos hacia el medio ambiente en España. CIS.

Coote, A. y Lenaghan, J. (1997). Citizens’ Juries: Theory into Practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

Cox, G.; Beresford, N.A.; Álvarez, B., Nisbet, A.; Oughton, D.; Kis, Z.; Eged, K.; Andersson, K.; Thørring, H.; Hunt, J.; Wright, S.; Barnett, C.; Gil, J.; Howard, B.J. y Crout, NMJ. (2005). Identifying optimal agricultural countermeasure strategies for a hypothetical contamination scenario using the strategy model. «Journal of Environmental Radioactivity», 83:383-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2004.05.021

Cropper, M.L. y Sussman, F.G. (1990). Valuing future risks to life. «Journal of environmental economics and management», 19, (2):160-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(90)90066-8

Green, P.E. y Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint Analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, 5:103-123. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721

Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. y Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall Int. Eds.

Hanley, N. y Mourato, S. (1999). «Choice modelling: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?» plenary paper, EAERE conference, June.

Hanley, N.; Mourato, S. y Wright, R. (2001). «Choice modelling approaches:a superior alternative for environmental valuation?» Journal of Economic Survey, 15:433-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00145

Hanley, N.; Shogren, J.F. y White, B. (1997). Environmental Economics in theory and practice. Macmillan Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24851-3

Hanley, N.; Wright, R. y Álvarez-Farizo, B. (2005). «Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive». Journal of Environmental Management (en prensa). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.001

Harrison, G. W. y Lesley, J. (1996). Must Contingent Valuation Surveys Cost So Much? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 1:79-95. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0033

Holl, K.D. y Howarth, R.B. (2000). «Paying for restoration». Restoration Ecology 8 (3):260- 267 Sep. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80037.x

Howard, B.J.; Beresford, N.A.; Nisbet, A; Cox, G.; Oughton, D.H.; Hunt, J. B.; Álvarez, B.; Andersson, K.G.; Liland, A. y Voigt, V. (2005).« The STRATEGY project: decision tools to aid sustainable restoration and long-term management of contaminated agricultural ecosystems». Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 83:275-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.01.013

Jefferson Centre (2004). Citizens’ Jury Handbook. Minnesota, Estados Unidos.

Kenyon, W.; Hanley, N. y Nevin, C. (2001). «Citizens’ Juries: An Aid to Environmental Valuation? » Environmental Planning C: Government & Policy, 19, 4:557-566. https://doi.org/10.1068/c4s

Kenyon, W.; Kevin, C. y Hanley, N. (2003). «Enhancing environmental decision-making using citizens’ juries». Local Environment, April 2003, vol. 8, n.° 2:221-232 (12). https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983032000048514

Kontoleon, A.; Macrory, R. y Swanson, T. (2001). Individual preferences, expert opinion and environmental decision making: an overview of the issues. Paper prepared for the Symposium in Law and Economics of Environmental policy.

Lancaster, K. (1966): «A new approach to consumer theory». Journal of Political Economy, 74:132-57. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

Louviere, J.J.; Hensher, D.A. y Swait, J.D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831

McFadden, D. (1974). «Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour», in Zarembka, P.(ed). Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York.

MacMillan, D.; Philip, L.; Hanley, N. y Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2003): «Valuing non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group-based approaches». Ecological Economics, 43:49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00182-9

Mazzotta, M. y Opaluch, J. (1995). «Decision making when choices are complex: A test of Heiner’s hypothesis», Land Econom. 71:500-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146714

Mazzotta, M.J.; Opaluch, J.J. y Grigalunas, T.A. (1994). «Natural resource damage assessment: the role of restoration». Natural Resources Journal, 34:153-178.

Montgomery, D.C. (2001). Design and analysis of experiments. 5th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 684 pp.

Navrud, S. (2003). «Methodologies and Results of Oil Spill Damage Assessments: Institutional Framework in the EU and the US», Seminario Científico Internacional Efectos economicos, sociais e ambientais da marea negra do Prestige, 7 y 8 de Marzo de 2003, Santiago de Compostela.

NOAA (1983). «Assessing the social costs of oil spills: The Amoco Cadiz case study», US Department of Commerce NOAA.

NOOA (1997). Natural Resource Damage Assessment Guidance Document: Scaling Compensatory Restoration Actions. Prepared by the Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD. December.

O’Connor, M. (2000a). «The VALSE project: an introduction», Ecological Economics, 34:165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00156-7

O’Connor, M. (2000b). «Pathways for environmental valuation: a walk in the (hanging) Gardens of Babylon», Ecological Economics, 34:175-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00157-9

Sagoff, M. (1988). The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sagoff, M. (1998). «Aggregation and Deliberation in Valuing Environmental Public Goods: A Look Beyond Contingent Pricing.» Ecological Economics, 24:213-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00144-4

Spash, C. L. (2000). The concerted action on environmental valuation in Europe (EVE): an introduction. Cambridge Research for the Environment, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Street, D.; Burgess, L. y Louviere, J. (en prensa). «Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments». Journal of Marketing Research.

Swait, J. y Adamowicz, W. (1996). The Effect of Choice Environment and Task Demands on Consumer Behaviour: Discriminating Between Contribution and Confusion. Working paper, Department of Rural Economy, Alberta.

Unsworth, R.E. y Bishop, R.C. (1994). «Assessing natural resource damages using environmental annuities». Ecological Economics, 11:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90048-5

Vázquez Rodriguez MX, Leon CJ. (2004). «Altruism and the economic values of environmental and social policies». Environmental & Resource Economics 28 (2):233-249. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000029919.95464.0b

White, I. y Nichols, J. (1982). «Considérations pratiques concernant le coût des marées noires in OCDE», 1982. Le coût des marées noires: 77-96.

Abstract Views

404
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2174-7350   ISSN: 1578-0732   https://doi.org/10.4995/earn