Imposing WTO disciplines on domestic support: an assessment of the Doha Round pproach

David Blandford

Abstract

The elements of the approach to disciplining domestic support for agriculture in the Doha round of WTO negotiations are evaluated using data for a selection of OECD countries. Despite a substantial increase in complexity in comparison to the Uruguay Round Agreement, the new approach is unlikely to require real reductions in trade-distorting support. As a result it is unlikely to stimulate further reforms in domestic agricultural policies in OECD countries.

Keywords

International trade; Agriculture; Domestic support; WTO

Subject classification

F02, F13, F14.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abler, D. and D. Blandford (2005). A Review of Empirical Studies of the Acreage and Production Response to U.S. Production Flexibility Contract Payments under the FAIR Act and Related Payments under Supplementary Legislation. OECD. Paris. http://www.oecd.org/

dataoecd/15/15/34997377.pdf.

Blandford, D. (2001). “Are Disciplines Required on Domestic Support?” The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 2(1):35-59.

Blandford, D. and Boisvert, R.N. (2005a). “Non-Trade Concerns, Multifunctionality and Policy Choice.” Paper presented at the seminar on The Impact of the Ongoing Negotiations in the WTO on Agriculture, held at the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration,

Bergen, Norway, June 2-3.

Blandford, D. and Boisvert, R.N. (2005b). “Non-Trade Concerns: Reconciling Domestic Policy Objectives with Trade Liberalization.” Int. J. Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 4:277-291. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2005.007457

Brink, L. (2005). “WTO 2004 Agriculture Framework: Disciplines on Distorting Domestic Support.” IATRC Working Paper 05-1. Available at http://iatrcweb.org.

de Gorter, H. M. Ingco and Ignacio, L. (2003). Domestic Support for Agriculture: Agricultural Policy Reform and Developing Countries. Trade Note 7. International Trade Department. World Bank.

FAO (1975). Agricultural Protection and Stabilization Policies: A Framework for Measurement in the Context of Agricultural Adjustment, C/75/LIM/2, Rome, October.

Fukuda, H.; Dyck J. and Stout, J. (2003). “Rice Sector Policies in Japan”. ERS/USDA Electronic Outlook Report RCS-0303-01. March. http://www.ers.usda.gov.

OECD (1987). National Policies and Agricultural Trade. Paris.

Roberts, I. (2005). WTO Agreement on Agriculture: The Blue Box in the July 2004 Framework Agreement. ABARE eReport 05.4, Canberra. March.

World Trade Organization (2001). Ministerial Declaration. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1 November 20.

World Trade Organization (2003). Negotiations on Agriculture: First Draft of Modalities for the Further Commitments (Revision). TN/AG/W/1/Rev. 1. March 18.

World Trade Organization (2004a). Doha Work Program: Decision Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004. WT/L/579. August 2.

World Trade Organization (2004b). United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton. WT/DS267/R. September 8. Geneva.

Abstract Views

288
Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Universitat Politècnica de València

e-ISSN: 2174-7350   ISSN: 1578-0732   https://doi.org/10.4995/earn