Assessing the conditions of Rationality and Plausibility in the valuation of biodiversity conservation in a mega-biodiverse country. The case of Manu in Perú

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.02

Keywords:

biodiversity conservation, choice experiment, functionality, sensitivity to scope, plausibility

Abstract

 According to NOAA, the results of an economic valuation are applicable as public policy if they fulfill two conditions: rationality and plausibility. In this study, we carried out the valuation of biodiversity conservation in Manu National Park in Peru (a megabiodiverse country), based on three representations: species, habitat and functionality. We identify sensitivity to scope in most of the attributes used. When we add socioeconomic characteristics, we identify that gender and salary levels affect preferences. Our total analysis shows that number of threatened plant species and functionality better fulfill both conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

José Dávila, Universidad Nacional Agraria ; ESAN Graduate School of Business

Círculo de Investigación en Economía de los Recursos naturales y del ambiente (CIERNA)

Felipe Vásquez-Lavín, Universidad del Desarrollo

School of Business and Economics.

Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, CAPES.

Center for Climate and Resilience Research, CR2.

Carlos Enrique Orihuela, Universidad Nacional Agraria

Círculo de Investigación en Economía de los Recursos naturales y del ambiente (CIERNA).
Facultad de Economía y Planificación. 

Roberto D. Ponce Oliva, Universidad del Desarrollo

School of Business and Economics.

Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability, CAPES.
 

Karol Lavado-Solis, Universidad Científica del Sur

Docente

Oscar Paredes-Vilca, Universidad Nacional Agraria

Doctor en Economía de los Recursos Naturales y el Desarrollo Sustentable

Raymundo Mogollón Ñañez, Universidad Nacional Agraria

Círculo de Investigación en Economía de los Recursos naturales y del ambiente (CIERNA)

Sabrina Díaz, Universidad Nacional Agraria

Círculo de Investigación en Economía de los Recursos naturales y del ambiente (CIERNA)

References

Adams, C., Seroa Da Motta, R., Ortiz, R.A., Reid, J., Ebersbach Aznar, C. & de Almeida Sinisgalli, P. A. (2008). "The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil)". Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.008

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, January 11, 1993. Obtenido de: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf

Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J.B., Thorsen, B.J., Lundhede, T.H., Strange, N. & Boman, M. (2018). "Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation across National Borders". Ecological Economics, 147, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.019

Bakhtiari, F., Lundhede, T.H., Gibbons, J., Strange, N. & Jacobsen, J.B. (2014). "Testing embedding or reversed embedding effects in valuation of forest biodiversity". Comunicación presentada al 5th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Estambul.

Bartkowski, B., Lienhoop, N. & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). "Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity". Ecological Economics, 113, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.023

Bartkowski, B. (2019). Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

Beaudet, C., Tardieu, L. & David, M. (2022). "Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation?" Ecological Economics, 200, 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107527

Becker, G.S. & Murphy, K.M. (1993). "A Simple Theory of Advertising as a Good or Bad". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 941-964. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118455

Bhat, M.Y., Bhatt, M.S. & Sofi, A.A. (2020). "Valuing biodiversity attributes: A choice experiment design". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08420-0

Borzykowski, N., Baranzini, A. & Maradan, D. (2018). "Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter?" Ecological Economics, 144, 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.005

Boyle, K.J., Bishop, R.C., Welsh, M.P. & Ahearn, M.C. (1998). Test of Scope in Contingent-Valuation Studies: Are the Numbers for the Birds. Obtenido de: https://www.academia.edu/22396027/Test_of_Scope_in_Contingent_Valuation_Studies_Are_the_Numbers_for_the_Birds

Boyle, K.J., Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F., Dunford, R.W. & Hudson, S.P. (1994). "An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1026

Burrows, J., Newman, R., Genser, J. & Plewes, J. (2017). "Do contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay for non-use environmental goods pass the scope test with adequacy? A review of the evidence from empirical studies in the literature". En: McFadden, D. & Train, K. (ed.), Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods (pp. 82-152). Cheltenham, Reino Unido: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434692.00011

Carson, R.T. & Mitchell, R.C. (1995). "Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1011

CBD (2016). Like-minded mega-diverse countries carta to achieve Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. Obtenido de: Convention on Biological Diversity: https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-13/information/cop-13-inf-45-en.pdf

Constanza, R., D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B, Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & Van Den Belt, M. (1997). "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital". Nature Search Journal, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Cummings, R. & Taylor, L. (1999). "Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method". American Economic Review, 89(3), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649

Czajkowski, M. & Hanley, N. (2009). "Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods". Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9299-z

Granado-Díaz, R., Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A. & Rodríguez-Entrena, M. (2018). "Análisis de la heterogeneidad de la demanda de bienes públicos procedentes del olivar de montaña en Andalucía". ITEA. Información Técnica Económica Agraria, 114(2): 158-182. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2018.011

Granado-Díaz, R., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Villanueva, A.J. & Rodríguez-Entrena, M. (2020). "Spatial analysis of demand for sparsely-located ecosystem services using alternative index approaches". European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(2), 752-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz036

Ferrini, S. & Turner, K. (2018). "McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth: Contingent valuation of environmental goods-a comprehensive critique". Journal of Economics, 125, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0606-4

Hanemann, W.M. (2001). "The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA". En Bateman, I. J & Willis, K. G. (Eds.) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries (pp. 42-96). New York, USA: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248915.003.0003

Hausman, J. & McFadden, D. (1984). "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit". Econometrica, 52(5), 1219-1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910997

Holmes, T.P. & Adamowicz, W.L. (2003). "Attribute-based methods". En Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. & Brown, T.C. (eds.): A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (pp.171-219) New York, USA: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_6

Hynes, S., Chen, W., Vondolia, K., Armstrong, C. & O'Connor, E. (2021). "Valuing the ecosystem service benefits from kelp forest restoration: A choice experiment from Norway". Ecological Economics, 179, 106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106833

Jacobsen, J.B., Boiesen, H., Thorsen, B.J., & Strange, N. (2008). "What's in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus' Iconised' species when valuing biodiversity". Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9107-6

Jacobsen, J.B., Hedemark, T., Martinsen, L., Hasler, B. & Thorsen, B.J. (2011). "Embedding effects in choice experiment valuations of environmental preservation projects". Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1170-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.013

Jordano, P. (2016). "Chasing Ecological Interactions". PLOS Biology. 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002559

Jorgensen, B.S., Wilson, M.A. & Heberlein, T.A. (2001). "Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope". Ecological Economics,36(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00210-X

Kahneman, D. & Knetsch, J. (1992). "Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S

Kasting, J.F.& Schultz, P.A. (1996). "Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation a Statement of Principles". Science, 272 (5268), 1571-1572. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5268.1571.c

Lancaster, K.J. (1966). "A new approach to consumer theory". Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

Lew, D.K., Layton, D.F. & Rowe, R.D. (2010). "Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection under Alternative Baseline Futures: The Case of the Steller Sea Lion University of California". Marine Resource Economics, 25(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-25.2.133

Lew, D.K. & Wallmo, K. (2011). "External Tests of Scope and Embedding in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species Valuation". Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9394-1

Loomis, J., Lockwood, M. & DeLacy, T. (1993). "Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1993.1025

Louviere, J., Hensher, D.A., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated Choice Methods Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831

Martin-Ortega, J., Mesa-Jurado, M. & Berbel, J. (2015). "Revisiting the impact of order effects on sensitivity to scope: A contingent valuation of a common-pool resource". Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3) 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12105

McFadden, D. (1974). "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour". En Zarembka, P. (ed.): Economic Theory and Mathematical Economics (pp. 105-142). New York, EEUU: Academic Press.

Morrison, G. (2000). Embedding and substitution in willingness to pay. Obtenido de: University of Nottingham: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/documents/discussion-papers/00-10.pdf

Morse-Jones, S., Bateman, I. J., Kontoleon, A., Ferrini, S., Burgess, N.D. & Turner, R.K. (2012). "Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects". Ecological Economics, 78, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.002

Musgrave, R.A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.

Mwebaze, P., Marris, G. C., Brown, M., MacLeod, A., Jones, G. & Budge, G. E. (2018). "Measuring public perception and preferences for ecosystem services: A case study of bee pollination in the UK". Land Use Policy, 71, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.045

Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G. & Nunes, P. (2008). "Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study". Ecological Economics, 67(2), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003

Nunes, P.A.L.D. & van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001). "Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense?" Ecological Economics, 39(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00233-6

Ojea, E. & Loureiro, M.L. (2009). "Valuation of Wildlife: Revising some additional considerations for scope tests". Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(2), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00129.x

Olar, M., Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., West, G.E., Lessard, F. & Cantin, G. (2007). Estimation of the Economic Benefits of Marine Mammal Recovery in the St. Lawrence Estuary. Obtenido de: Canada. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Quebec Region. Policy and Economics Branch: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/mpo-dfo/Fs124-2-2008-eng.pdf

Orihuela, C.E., Minaya, C.A., Mercado, W., Jiménez, L.A., Estrada, M. & Gómez, H.J. (2020). "Efecto distancia en la disposición a pagar por la conservación de la biodiversidad: el caso de un área protegida megadiversa". Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics, 20(1), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2020.01.08

Patterson, B., Stotz, D. & Solari, S. (2006). "Mammals and Birds of the Manu Biosphere Reserve, Peru". Fieldiana Zoology, 110, 1. https://doi.org/10.3158/0015-0754(2006)110[1:MABOTM]2.0.CO;2

Pouta, E. (2005). "Sensitivity to scope of environmental regulation in contingent valuation of forest cutting practices in Finland". Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.002

Remoundou, K., Diaz-Simal, P., Koundouri, P. & Rulleau, B. (2015). "Valuing climate change mitigation: A choice experiment on a coastal and marine ecosystem". Ecosystem Services, 11, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.003

Ressurreição, A., Gibbons, J., Dentinho, T., Kaiser, M., Santos, R. & Edwards-Jones, G. (2011). "Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea". Ecological Economics, 70(4), 729-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.009

Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H. & Sukhdev, P. (2010). "Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: The TEEB initiative". Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005

Rolfe, J. & Windle, J. (2012). "Distance Decay Functions for Iconic Assets: Assessing National Values to Protect the Health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia". Environmental and Resource Economics, 53, 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9565-3

Rollins, K. & Lyke, A. (1998). "The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 324-344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1045

Rudd, M.A. (2009). "National values for regional aquatic species at risk in Canada". Inter-Research Science Publisher, 6(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00160

Samuelson, P.A. (1954). "The pure theory of public expenditure". The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895

Samuelson, P.A. (1955). "Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure". The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925849

SERNANP, (2014). Plan Maestro del Parque Nacional del Manu. Diagnóstico 2013-2018. Obtenido de: Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas: https://global.wcs.org/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/API/Entries/Download?EntryId=27461&PortalId=94&DownloadMethod=attachment

Spencer-Cotton, A., Kragt, M.E. & Burton, M. (2018). "Spatial and Scope Effects: Valuations of Coastal Management Practices". Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12301

Szabó, Z. (2011). "Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: Improving the validity of biodiversity valuation". Ecological Economics, 72, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.025

Talebi, Y., Najafi, H., Esmaili, R., Asadi, M., Mosavi, S. & Vakilpoor, M. (2022). "Estimation of the monetary value of biodiversity in the Central Alborz Protected Area". Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19553-19562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17147-5

Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Vedogbeton, H. & Johnston, R. (2020). "Commodity Consistent Meta-Analysis of Wetland Values: An Illustration for Coastal Marsh Habitat". Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 835-865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00409-0

Villanueva, A.J., Granado-Díaz, R. & Gómez-Limón, J.A. (2018). La producción de bienes públicos por parte de los sistemas agrarios. Córdoba, España: UCOpress, Editorial Universidad de Córdoba.

Wallmo, K. & Lew, D.K. (2016). "A comparison of regional and national values for recovering threatened and endangered marine species in the United States". Journal of Environmental Management, 179, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.053

Wheeler, S. & Damania, R. (2001). "Valuing New Zealand recreational fishing and an assessment of the validity of the contingent valuation estimates". Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(4), 599-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00159

Whitehead, J.C. (2016). "Plausible responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation". Ecological Economics, 128, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.011

Published

2023-06-26

Issue

Section

Article