Molecular genetic diversity and conservation priorities of Egyptian rabbit breeds
Keywords:Egyptian rabbits, genetic diversity, microsatellite markers, prioritization, conservation
The limited rabbit resources in Egypt are threatened by the danger of extinction, whereas genetic diversity studies of native breeds could play a vital role in conservation and improvement of these breeds. In this study, 3 native rabbit breeds: Gabali (G), Baladi Red (BR) and Baladi Black (BB), in addition to New Zealand White (NZW), were genotyped using 12 microsatellite markers. All the typed microsatellites were polymorphic by average number of alleles 5.25 per locus. Observed and expected heterozygosity per locus averaged 0.62 and 0.68, respectively. The average polymorphic information content was 0.71 and the highest polymorphic information content was recorded in locus SOL33 by 0.85. All the studied loci except SAT7 and SAT2 showed deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium with significant level. The inbreeding coefficient of the individuals relative to the total population was 0.07. The within-population heterozygote deficit averaged 0.07 and ranged from 0.141 in BR to 0.015 in BB breeds. The highest pairwise differentiation among the populations was recorded between BB and NZW (0.071), while the lowest value was recorded between BR and both of G (0.038) and BB (0.039). The lowest pairwise Nei’s genetic distance was recorded between BR and BB (0.190), while the highest was recorded between NZW and BB breeds (0.409). BR and G populations were clustered together forming an admixed mosaic cluster. BR recorded the highest contribution in the aggregate genetic diversity based on the three prioritisation methods used.
Abdel-Kafy E.S.M., Ahmed S.S.E.D., El-Keredy A., Ali N.I., Ramadan S. , Farid A. 2018. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the native rabbits in Middle Egypt. Vet. World, 11: 1120. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1120-1126
Bruford M.W., Wayne R.K. 1993. Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 3: 939-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-437X(93)90017-J
Caballero A., Toro M.A. 2002. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Conserv. Genet., 3: 289-299.
Crispim B.d.A., Seno L.d.O., Egito A.A.d., Vargas Jr F.M.d., Grisolia A.B. 2014. Application of microsatellite markers for breeding and genetic conservation of herds of Pantaneiro sheep. Electron. J. Biotechnol., 17: 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2014.09.007
El-Aksher S.H., Sherif H., Khalil M., El-Garhy H.A., Ramadan S. 2017. Molecular analysis of a new synthetic rabbit line and their parental populations using microsatellite and SNP markers. Gene Reports, 8: 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2017.05.001
Emam A., Azoz A., Mehaisen G., Ferrand N. , Ahmed N. 2017. Diversity assessment among native Middle Egypt rabbit populations in North Upper-Egypt province by microsatellite polymorphism. World rabbit Sci., 25: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2017.5298
Galal S. 2007. Farm animal genetic resources in Egypt: fact sheet. Egypt. J. Anim. Prod., 44: 1-23.
Grimal A., Safaa H., Saenz-de-Juano M., Viudes-de-Castro M., Mehaisen G., Elsayed D., Lavara R., Marco-Jiménez F., Vicente J. 2012. Phylogenetic relationship among four Egyptian and one Spanish rabbit populations based on microsatellite markers. In Proc.: 10th World Rabbit Congress, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 3-6 September, 2012. 3-6.
Jakobsson M., Rosenberg N. A. 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics, 23: 1801-1806. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233
Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L. , Marshall T.C. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol., 16: 1099-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x
Khalil M. 1999. Rabbit genetic resources of Egypt. Anim. Genet. Resour., 26: 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S101423390000122X
Khalil M., Baselga M. 2002. Rabbit genetic resources in Mediterranean countries, CIHEAM-IAMZ.
Khalil M., Motawei M., Al-Saef A., Al-Sobayil K., El-Zarei M. 2008. RAPD markers linked to litter, lactation and growth traits in rabbits. In Proc.: 9th World Rabbit Congress, Verona, Italy, 10-13 June, 2008, 143-148.
Lai F.Y., Ding S.T., Tu P.A., Chen R.S., Lin D.Y., Lin E.C., Wang P.H. Population structure and phylogenetic analysis of laboratory rabbits in Taiwan based on microsatellite markers. World Rabbit Sci., 26: 57-70. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.7362
MacHugh D.E., Shriver M.D., Loftus R.T., Cunningham P., Bradley D.G. 1997. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics, 146: 1071-1086.
Marsjan P., Oldenbroek J. 2007. Molecular markers, a tool for exploring genetic diversity (Section C in part 4). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO.
Nei M., Tajima F., Tateno Y. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J. Mol. Evol., 19: 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300753
Ollivier L., Foulley J.L. 2005. Aggregate diversity: new approach combining within-and between-breed genetic diversity. Livest. Prod. Sci., 95: 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.01.005
Peakall R., Smouse P.E. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes., 6: 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
Petit R.J., El Mousadik A., Pons O. 1998. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv. Biol., 12: 844-855. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96489.x
Ramadan S., Kayang B.B., Inoue E., Nirasawa K., Hayakawa H., Ito S.I. , Inoue-Murayama M. 2012. Evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation priorities for Egyptian chickens. O.J.A.S., 2: 183. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2012.23025
Raymond M. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered., 86: 248-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573
Rosenberg N.A. 2004. DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 137-138. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x
Saitou N., Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4: 406-425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. 1984. Estimating Fâ€statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x
This journal is licensed under a "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)".