Comparison of degrees of maturity of rabbit lines selected for different traits

M. Pascual; E.W. Calle; A. Blasco

doi:10.4995/wrs.2015.3964

Authors

M. Pascual Department of Animal Production and Public Health. Catholic University of Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”.
E.W. Calle Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València
A. Blasco Institute of Animal Science and Technology, Universitat Politècnica de València

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2015.3964

Keywords:

adult weight, maturity degree, rabbit, selection

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study whether commercial nucleus lines of rabbits selected for different traits, and experimental lines having commercial purposes, have the same degree of maturity when compared at the same slaughter age. The study was carried out with 17897 rabbits from Universitat Politècnica de València. Rabbits came from the maternal lines A (3902 rabbits; 44^th generation), V (4238 rabbits; 39^th generation) and LP (6115 rabbits; 9^th generation), selected for litter size at weaning; the paternal line R (2023 rabbits; 25^th generation), selected for growth rate between 28 and 63 days of age; the maternal line OR (586 rabbits; 11^th generation) selected for ovulation rate; and the lines High (503 rabbits; 5^th generation) and Low (530 rabbits; 5^thgeneration) lines, from a divergent selection for high and low intramuscular fat, respectively. Rabbits were weighted at 28 (W28) and 63 (W63) days of age. Rabbit does (42, 25, 39, 94, 14, 32 and 22 from lines A, V, R, LP, OR, High and Low, respectively) were weighed between 30 and 80 wk of age to determine adult weight (AW). Line R had higher W28 and W63, growth rate between 28 and 63 d of age and AW than lines A, V and LP (5802 g vs. 4410, 4222, and 4391 g for AW, respectively). No relevant differences between lines in degrees of maturity at 28 and 63 d of age and time to reach 40% of degree of maturity (percentage of weight compared to AW) were found between lines A, V, R and LP, but the degree of maturity at 2000 g and the time taken to reach that weight were lower in line R (34.7% and 55.2 d) than in lines A (45.5% and 71.1 d), V (47.4% and 69.6 d), and LP (45.8% and 68.0 d). No relevant differences were found between lines OR, High and Low in the traits analysed. A robustness analysis showed that results can be extrapolated to other commercial lines and other slaughter weights. In conclusion, comparison of lines at similar slaughter age could be considered a valid approach for comparisons at the same maturity stage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariño B., Hernandez P., Pla P., Blasco A. 2007. Comparison between rabbit lines for sensory meat quality. Meat Sci., 75: 494-498. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.08.013

Baselga M. 2002. Rabbit Genetic Resources in Mediterranean Countries. 1st ed. Options mediterraneenes, serie B: Etudes et recherches, Zaragoza, Spain.

Blasco A., Gómez E. 1993. A note on growth curves of rabbit lines selected on growth rate or litter size. Anim. Prod., 57:332-334. doi:10.1017/S000335610000698X

Blasco A., Piles M., Varona L. 2003. A Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for growth rate on growth curves in rabbits. Genet. Sel. Evol., 35: 21-41. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-35-1-21

Brody S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Ed. London, Hafner Press. Cantier A., Vezinhet R., Rouvier R., Dauzier L. 1969. Allométrie de croissance chez le lapin (Oryctolagus cuniculus). 1. Principaux organes et tissues. Ann. Biol. Anim. Bioch. Biophys., 9: 5-39. doi:10.1051/rnd:19690101

Coutelet, G. 2013. Résultats technico-économiques des éleveurs de lapins de chair en France en 2012. In Proc.: 15èmes Journées de la Recherche Cunicole, 19-20 novembre 2013. Le Mans, France. 1: 111-113.

Gondret F., Combes S., Larzul C., Rochambeau H. 2002. Effects of divergent selection for body weight at a fixed age on histological, chemical and rheological characteristics of rabbits muscles. Liv. Prod. Sci., 76: 81-89. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00003-9

Hernández P., Aliaga S., Pla M., Blasco A. 2004. The effect of selection for growth rate and slaughter age on carcass composition and meat quality traits in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 82: 3138-8143.

Hernández P., Ariño B., Grimal A., Blasco A. 2006. Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of three rabbit lines selected for litter size or growth rate. Meat Sci., 73: 645-650. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.007

Laborda P., Moce L., Santacreu M.A., Blasco A. 2011. Selection for ovulation rate in rabbits: Genetic parameters, direct response, and correlated response on litter size. J. Anim. Sci., 89: 2981-2987. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-3906

Larzul C., Gondret F., Combes S., Rochambeau H. 2005. Divergent selection on 63-day body weight in the rabbit: response on growth, carcass and muscle traits. Genet. Sel. Evol., 37: 105-122. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-37-1-105

Ouhayoun J., Rouvier R. 1973. Composition corporelle et degré de maturité en poids de lapereaux de plusieurs génotypes. J.Rech. Avic. Cunic., Paris.

Pascual M., Pla M. 2007. Changes in carcass composition and meat quality when selecting rabbits for growth rate. Meat Sci., 77: 474-481. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.009

Pascual M., Pla M. 2008. Changes in collagen, texture and sensory properties of meat when selecting rabbits for growth rate. Meat Sci., 78: 375-380. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.009

Pascual M., Pla M., Blasco A. 2008. Effect of selection for growth rate on relative growth in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 86: 3409-3417. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-0976

Pla M., Guerrero L., Guardia D., Oliver M.A., Blasco A. 1998. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of rabbit lines selected for different objectives: I. Between lines comparison. Livest. Prod. Sci., 54: 115-123. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00179-6

Pla M., Hernández P., Blasco A. 1996. Carcass composition and meat characteristics of two rabbit breeds of different degree of maturity. Meat Sci., 44: 85-92. doi:10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00079-4

Sánchez J. P., Theilgaard P., Mínguez C., Baselga M. 2008. Constitution and evaluation of a long-lived productive rabbit line. J. Anim. Sci., 86:515-525. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0217

SATA. 2012. Relazione dell’attività tecnica Sezione Conigli. Anno 2012. Servizio di Assistenza Tecnica agli Allevamenti. Available at: http://www.m.regione.lombardia.it/shared/ccurl/433/175/REL.TEC.4%20-%20CONIGLI.pdf. Accessed June 2015.

Serrano P., Pascual M., Lavara R., Gómez E. A. 2012. Analysis of management techniques on productivity indicators using the bdcuni Spanish database. In Proc.: 10th World Rabbit Congress, Sharm El Sheik - Egipto. 1: 803-807.

Taylor C. S. 1985. Use of genetic size-scaling in evaluation of animal growth. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 118-143.

Taylor C. S., Murray J.I. 1987a. Genetic aspects of mammalian growth and survival in relation to body size. In: Academic Press, 1987: 58.

Taylor C. S., Murray J.I. 1987b. Voluntary food intake of cattle differing in breed size in a time-controlled feeding system. Anim. Prod., 45, 433-452. doi:10.1017/S0003356100002920

Thiessen R. B., Hnizdo E., Maxwell D. A. G., Gibson D. Taylor C. S. 1984. Multibreed comparisons of British cattle. Variation in body weight, growth rate and food intake. Anim. Prod. 38: 323-340. doi:10.1017/S0003356100041520

Zomeño C., Hernandez P., Blasco A. 2013. Divergent selection for intramuscular fat content in rabbits. I. Direct response to selection. J. Anim. Sci., 91: 4526-4531. doi:10.2527/jas.2013-6361