Análisis multicriterio de preferencias sociales en gestión hídrica bajo la Directiva Marco del Agua

P. Mesa; J. Martín-Ortega; Julio Berbel

doi:10.7201/earn.2008.02.06

Authors

P. Mesa Ayesa
J. Martín-Ortega Universidad de Córdoba
Julio Berbel Universidad de Córdoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2008.02.06

Keywords:

Water Framework Directive, Water management, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Multicriteria

Abstract

This work aims to contribute to the implementation of the WFD with regard to the selection of the measures for a sustainable and socially accepted water management. A multicriteria decision support exercise is applied to the Guadalquivir River Basin in order to test the applicability of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in the new WFD context. A survey was carried out in the context of a future enlargement of La Breña reservoir (Córdoba). This analysis aims to obtain the public’s weight of the criteria in water management, in order to assess the legitimacy of the reservoir enlargement, as well as other management measures. Results suggest that the AHP is an adequate tool for the WFD purposes and a useful complement for the cost-effectiveness analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

J. Martín-Ortega, Universidad de Córdoba

Departamento de Economía, Sociología y Política agrarias

Julio Berbel, Universidad de Córdoba

Departamento de Economía, Sociología y Política agrarias

References

Aczel, J. y Saaty, T.L. (1983). «Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements». Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27:93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7

Albi Ibáñez, E. (1989). Introducción al análisis coste-beneficio. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda. Madrid.

Alphonce, C. B. (1997). «Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries». Agricultural Systems, 53:97-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00035-2

Aull-Hyde, R., Erdogan, S. y Duke, J.M. (2006). «An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP». European Journal of Operational Research, 171:290-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.037

Aznar Bellver, J. y Estruch Guitart, V. (2006). «Valoración de un activo ambiental mediante métodos multicriterio. Aplicación a la valoración del parque natural del Alto Tajo». Comunicación presentada en el VI Coloquio Ibérico de Estudios Rurales. Huelva.

Altuzarra, A., Moreno-Jiménez J.M. y Salvador, M. (2007). «A Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making». European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1):367-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.025

Belton, V. y Gear, T. (1983). «On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies». Omega, 11(3):228-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6

Berbel, J. y Gutiérrez, C. (2004). I Estudio de sostenibilidad del regadío en el Guadalquivir. Feragua. Sevilla.

Ceña, F. y Romero, C. (1982). Evaluación económica y financiera de inversiones agrarias. Banco de Crédito Agrícola. Madrid.

Chou, M.T., Lee, H.S., Chu, C.W. y Cheng, C.Y. (2007). «Synthesizing comparison matrices of AHP under group decision», en Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. Springer, Berlin:1323-1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74827-4_165

Cohon, J.L. y Marks, D.H. (1975). «A review and evaluation of multiobjective programming techniques». Water Resources, 11(2):208-220. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR011i002p00208

Comisión Europea, (2003). Economics and the environment: the implementation challenge of the Water Framework Directive. A guidance document. WATECO. Common implementation estrategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC).

Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir. (2005). Informe artículos 5 y 6 DMA. www.chguadalquivir.es.

Duke, J.M. y Aull-Hyde, R. (2002). «Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process». Ecological Economics, 42(1-2):131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00053-8

Field, B.C. y Field, M.K. (2002). Environmental economics. McGraw Hill. Nueva York.

Forman, E. y Peniwati, K. (1998). «Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process». European Journal of Operational Research, 108:165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0

Gómez-Limón, J.A. y Atance Muñiz, I. (2004). «Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support». Journal of Policy Modelling, 27(8-9):1045-1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.07.005

Green, C. (2003). Water economics, principles and practice. Wiley. West Sussex.

Hipel, K.W. (1992). «Multiple objective decision-making in water-resources». Water Resources Bulletin, 28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb03150.x

IESA-CSIC (2005) Ecobarómetro de Andalucía-2005. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/web/Bloques_Tematicos/Educacion_Y_Participacion_Ambiental/Sensibilizacion/Ecobarometro/EBA_2005.pdf.

Jaber J.O. y Mohsen, M. (2002). «Evaluation of non-conventional water resources supply in Jordan». Desalination, 136:83-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00168-0

Lee, C.S., y Wen, C.G. (1996). «Application of multiobjective programming to water quality management in a river basin». Journal of Environmental Management., 47(1):11-26. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1996.0032

Linares, P. y Romero, C. (2002). «Aggregation of preferences in an environmental economics context: A goal-programming approach». The International Journal of Management Science, 30:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00059-7

Martín-Ortega, J. y Berbel, J. (2006). «Análisis económico y enfoque multicriterio en aplicación de la DMA al Guadalquivir». Comunicación presentada al I Congreso Andaluz de Desarrollo Sostenible y V Congreso Andaluz de Ciencias Ambientales. Granada.

Martín-Ortega, J., Gutiérrez, C. y Berbel, J. (2008). «Caracterización de los usos del agua en la Demarcación del Guadalquivir en aplicación de la Directiva Marco de Aguas». Revista de Estudios Regionales, 81:45-76.

Millet, I. (1998). «Ethical decision making using the Analytic Hierarchy Process». Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11):1197-1204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005700314298

MIMAM (2007). Precios y costes de los servicios del agua en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid. http://www.fundacion-biodiversidad.es/opencms/export/fundacionbiodiversidad/envios/portal_debate07.html.

Parra, C. Calatrava, J. y Haro, T. (2004). «Evaluación comparativa multifuncional de sistemas agrarios mediante AHP: aplicación al olivar ecológico, integrado y convencional en Andalucía ». Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 9:27-56.

Perry, C. J., Rock, M. y Seckler, D. (1997). «Water as an economic good: A solution, or a problem? » En Kay, M., Franks, T. and Smith, L. (Eds.): Water: Economics Management and Demand. E & FN Spon. Londres: 3-11.

Ramanathan, R. y Ganesh, L.S. (1994). «Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members weightages». European Journal of Operational Research, 79:249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90356-5

Renn, O., Webler, T. y Winpenny, J.T. (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8

Reyna Doménech, S. y Cardells Romero, F. (1999). «Valoración AHP de los ecosistemas naturales de la Comunidad Valenciana». Revista valenciana d’estudis autonòmics, 27:153-177.

Risk Policy analyst Ltd. (2004). CEA and developing a methodology for assessing disproportionate costs. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, U.K. (DEFRA).

Romero, C. (1993). Teoría de la decisión multicriterio. Conceptos, técnicas y aplicaciones. Alianza Editorial. Madrid.

Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierachy Process. McGraw-Hill. Nueva York. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804

Saaty, T.L. y Kearns, K.P. (1985). Analytical planning. The organization of systems. Pergamon Press. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-032599-6.50007-6

Sáenz de Miera, G. (2002). Agua y Economía. Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Madrid.

Srdjevic, B., Medeiros, Y., Srdjevic, Z. y Schaer, M. (2002). «Evaluating management strategies », en Andrea, E., Rizzoli, A. y Jakeman, J. (Eds.): Paraguacu River Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. 1st Biennial Meeting of the iEMSS.

Srdjevic, B. (2007). «Linking Analytic Hierarchy Process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management». Decision Support Systems, 42(4):2261-2273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.08.001

Trémolet Consulting (2006). Analysis of member states and pilot river basin submissions on the state of play for cost-effectiveness analysis in the WFD (draft report). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, U.K.

Van Den Honert, R. C. y Lootsma, F. A. (1997). «Group preference aggregation in the multiplicative AHP. The model of the group decision process and Pareto optimality». European Journal of Operational Research, 96(2):363-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00345-2

Wittmer, H., Rauschmayer, F. y Klauer, B. (2006). «How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?». Land Use Policy, 23:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.003