Preferences heterogeneity and choice experiments: A random parameters logit applied to the demand of walnuts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2004.08.06Keywords:
mixed or random parameters logit, stated preferences, choice experiment, heterogeneous preferences, walnutsAbstract
Consumers’ stated preferences towards walnuts are studied by means of a choice experiment, with a double objective: first, to identify the main attributes searched by consumer at purchase and second, to analyse the chances for the introduction into the Spanish market of the Pecan variety. From this study, commercial guidelines may be derived, that helps distribution and import companies to commercialise this nut. A mixed or random parameters logit is estimated which relaxes the IIA property (independence of irrelevant alternatives) present in the logit model with fixed parameters. In a mixed logit, coefficients of each attribute/level vary randomly across consumers, reflecting the heterogeneity of individuals’ preferences. This model also allows estimate efficiently the parameters when each individual chooses several times, as in the present study.Downloads
References
Adamowicz, W.; Louviere, J. y Williams, M. (1994). «Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities». Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26:271-292. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1017
Adamowicz, W.; Boxall, P.; Williams, M. y Louviere, J.J. (1998). «Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80:64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269
Alfnes, F. (2004). «Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(1):19-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.1.19
Ben-Akiva, M. y Bierlaire, M. (1999). «Discrete choice methods and their applications in short term travel decisions» in R. Hall, ed., The Handbook of Transportation Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5203-1_2
Ben-Akiva, M. y Morikawa, T. (1990). «Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions». Tranportation Research, 24:485-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(90)90037-7
Bennett, J. y Blamey, R. (2001) (Eds.). The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Bonnet, C. y Simioni, M. (2001). «Assessing consumer response to Protected Designation of Origin labelling: a mixed multinomial logit approach». European Journal of Agricultural Economics, 28(4):433-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.433
Boyle, K.J.; Holmes, T.P.; Teisl, M.F. y Roe, B. (2001). «A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2):441-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00168
Burton, M.; Rigby, D.; Young, T. y James, S. (2001). «Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(4):479-498. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.479
Burton, M. y Pearse, D. (2002). «Consumer attitudes towards genetic modification, functional foods, and microorganisms: a choice modelling experiment for beer». AgBioForum, 5(2):51-58.
Dhar, R. (1997). «Consumer preference for a no-choice option». Journal of Consumer Research, 24:215-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/209506
Ekinci, S. (1997). «La demanda de almendra y nuez en España una aplicación del modelo de doble obstáculo (double Hurdle)». Mimeo IAMZ- CIHEAM.
Elrod, T.; Louviere, J.J. y Davey, K.S. (1992). «An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice based conjoint models». Journal of Marketing Research, 29:368-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900307
Enneking, U. (2004). «Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label». European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(2):205-223. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.2.205
Garrod, G.D.; Scarpa, R., y K.G. Willis. (2002). «Estimating The Benefits of Traffic Calming on Through Routes: A Choice Experiment Approach». Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. May, 36(2), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.222149
Gracia, A.; Ekinci, S. y Albisu, L.M. (2003). «Consumer’s buying decision process for nuts in Spain». New Medit, II (3):22-27.
Haaijer, M.E. (1999). «Modeling Conjoint Choice Experiments with the Probit Model». Labyrint Publications. The Netherlands.
Haaijer, R.; Kamakura,W. y Wedel, M. (2001). «The ‘no-choice’ alternative in conjoint choice experiments». Journal of the Market Research Society, 43(1):93-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530104300105
Hanley, N.; MacMillan, D.; Wright, R.E.; Bullock, C.; Simpson, I.; Parsisson, D. y Crabtree, B. (1998). «Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland». Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x
Holmes, T.P.; Boyle, K.J.; Teisl, M.F. y Roe, B. (2002). «A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats: reply». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4):1172-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00378
James, S. y Burton, M. (2003). «Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system». The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(4): 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2003.t01-1-00225.x
Johnson, R. y Orme, B. (1996). «How many questions should you ask in choice based conjoint studies?». Art Forum, Beaver Creek.
Lawson, S. y Glowa, T. (2000). «Discrete choice experiments and traditional conjoint analysis ». Quirk’s Marketing Research Review (www.quirks.com), Article number: 0592.
Louviere, J.J.; Hensher, D.A. y Swait, J.D. (2000). «Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application». Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831
Lusk, J.L. (2002). «A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats: comment». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4):1165-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00377
McFadden, D. (1973). «Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour» in: P. Zarembka (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.
MAPA (2001). Anuario de estadística agroalimentaria. MAPA online http://www.mapa.es/es/estadistica/Anu_01/indice.asp?parte=2&capitulo=15.
MAPA (2002). Anuario de estadística agroalimentaria. MAPA online http://www.mapa.es/es/estadistica/Anu_02/indice.asp.
MERCASA (2003). Alimentación en España. Producción, industria, distribución y consumo.
Muncharaz, P. (2001). El Nogal. Técnicas de cultivo para la producción frutal. Ed. Mundi-Prensa.
Quagrainie, K.K.; Unterschultz, J. y Veeman, M. (1998). «Effects of product origin and selected demographics on consumer choice of red meats». Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46:201-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.1998.tb00363.x
Revelt, D. y Train, K. (1998). «Incentives for appliance efficiency in a competitive energy environment: random parameters logit models of households’ choices». Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4):647-657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557735
Rigby, D. y Burton, M. (2003). Capturing preference heterogeneity in stated choice models: a random parameter logit model of the demand for GM food. Discussion Paper Series nº 0319. School of Economic Studies. The University of Manchester.
Roy, R. (1990). «Conjoint evolves into discrete choice modelling». Quirk’s Marketing Research Review (www.quirks.com), Article number: 0879.
Rubey, L. y Lupi, F. (1997). «Predicting the effects of market reform in Zimbabwe: a stated preference approach». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:89-99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243945
Sanjuán, A.I.; Sánchez, M.; Gil, J.M.; Gracia, A. y Soler, F. (2003). «Brakes to organic market enlargement in Spain: consumers’ and retailers’ attitudes and willingness to pay». International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2):134-144. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00295.x
Scarpa, R.; Philippidis, G. y Spalatro, F. (2004) «‘Product-Country Images’ and Preference Heterogeneity for Mediterranean Food Products: A Discrete Choice Framework». Agribusiness (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20051
Train, K.E. (1998). «Recreational demand models with taste differences over people». Land Economics, 74(2):230-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147053
Train, K.E. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753930
Wu, J. (2002). «Data Use: Analyzing discrete choice data on monadic cards». Quirk’s Marketing Research Review (www.quirks.com), Article number: 0987.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
