Economic analysis of soil erosion: The off-site effects evaluation in the Genil basin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2004.08.02Keywords:
Monetary evaluation, Externalities, Choice Experiment, ErosionAbstract
The paper presents the economic evaluation of the soil erosion off-farm effects by means of the Choice Experiment method. After a review of the main studies that consider, under a socio-economic point of view, the soil erosion problem an application of the choice experiment to monetary evaluation of the off-farm effects of soil erosion in the Alto Genil watershed (Granada province) is described. The choice experiment method allows the estimation of the values of the most important soil erosion impacts, so that to provide public-decisors with useful information regarding land management. Also, the welfare change experimented by citizens, due to the implementation of soil erosion reduction policies, is investigated. These evaluations will be compared with the subsidy that the regional government grants to farmers that adopt soil conservation measures.Downloads
References
Alfsen, K.H.; De-Franco, M.A.; Glomsrod, S. y Johnsen, T. (1996). «The cost of soil erosion in Nicaragua». Ecological Economics, 16:129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00083-6
Almansa, M.C. y Calatrava, J. (2001). «Aplicación del método de Valoración Contingente a la valoración económica de las externalidades generadas en los proyectos de restauración hidrológica forestal». III Congreso Forestal Español, Granada, 25-28 septiembre.
Álvarez, A.; Herruzo, A.C., y Zekri, S. (1994). «Intertemporal profit from soil conservation practices in mediterranean dry farming». XXII International Conference of Agricultural Economist, Harare, August.
Ben-Akiva, M. y Lerman, S.R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press. Cambridge.
Bunn, J.A. (1997). «The implications of alternative beliefs about soil-erosion-productivity relationships and conservation treatments for the economic dynamics of soil erosion on the southern Texas High Plains». Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 52(5):368-375.
Carcamo, J.A.; Alwang, J., y Norton, G.W. (1994). «On-site economic evaluation of soil conservation practices in Honduras». Agricultural Economics, 11:257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5150(94)00016-6
Clark, E.H.; Haverkamp, J.A. y Chapman, W. (1985). Eroding Soils: The off-farm Impacts. Washington, D.C: The Conservation Foundation.
Colombo, S. y Calatrava J. (2002). «Towards the economic evaluation of the intangible effects of soil erosion». Xth Congress of European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Zaragoza, Spain.
Colombo, S.; Calatrava J. y Hanley N. (2003). «The economic benefits of soil erosion control: an application of the contingent valuation method in the Alto Genil basin of southern Spain». Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (58):367-371.
Colombo, S. (2004): Valoración y análisis económico de impactos ambientales en procesos erosivos: aplicación de los métodos de valoración contingente y experimento de elección en la cuenca del Alto Genil. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Granada.
Chung, S.W.; Gassman, P.W.; Kramer, L.A.; Williams, J.R., y Gu, R. (1999). «Validation of EPIC for Two Watersheds in Southwest Iowa)». Journal of Environmental Quality, 28:971-979. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800030030x
Domencich, T. y McFadden, D. (1975): «Urban travel demand: a behavioural approach». Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Earle, T.R.; Rose, C. W. y Brownlea, A.A. (1979). «Socio-economic Predictors of Intention towards Soil Convervation and their Implication in Environmental Management». Journal of Environmental Management, 9:225-236.
Feather, P. y Hellerstein, D. (1997). «Benefit Function Transfer to Assess the Conservation Reserve Program». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(1):151-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243950
Goetz, R.U. (1997). «Diversification in Agricultural Production: A dynamic Model of Optimal Cropping to Manage Soil Erosion». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79:341-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244134
Gunatilake, H.M., y Vieth, G.R. (2000). «Estimation of On-site Cost of Soil Erosion: A Comparison of Replacement and Productivity Change Methods». Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55(2):197-204.
Hanemann,W.M. (1984). «Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Responses». American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3):332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
Hansen, L.; Breneman, V.; Davison, C. y Dichen, C. (2002). «The Cost of Soil Erosion to Downstream Navigation». Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57(4):205-212.
Hansen, L.; Feather, P. y Shank, D. (1999). «Valuation of Agriculture’s Multi-Site Environmental Impact». Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 28(2):199-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500008194
Hellerstein, D. (1998). «An Analysis of Wildlife Recreation Using the FHWAR». En, Wester Regional Research Publication: W133 Benefits an Costs of Resource Policies Affecting Public and Private Lands, Ed. Paul M. Jakus. June.
Krinsky, I. y Robb, A., (1986). «On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities». Review of Economics and Statistics, 68:715-719. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
Lancaster, K. (1991): Modern Consumer Theory. Edward Elgar, Brookfield.
Lee, J.J.; Phillips, D.L. y Benson, V.W. (1999). «Soil Erosion and Climate Change Assessing Potential Impacts and Adaptation Practices». Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54(3):529-536.
Louviere, J.J. (1988). Analysing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis, No 67, Quantitative Applications in the Social Science Series. Sage Publications, Newburg Park, California.
Lucila, M.; Lapar, A., y Pandey, S. (1999). «Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippine uplands». Agricultural Economics, 21:241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(99)00028-6
Mansky, C. (1977). «The Structure of Random Utility Models». Theory and Decision, 8:229- 254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133443
McFadden, D. (1973). «Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour». En, P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics, New York: Academic Press, pp. 105-142.
Ministerio Medio Ambiente (2002). Plan forestal Español. Julio, 2002. Disponible en la página Web del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
Palmquist, R.B., y Danielson, L.E. (1989). «A Hedonic Study of the Effects of Erosion Control and Drainage on Farmland Values». American Journal Agricultural Economics, 71(1):55-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241774
Pattanayak, S., y Mercer, D.E. (1998). «Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: contour hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines». Agricultural Economics, 18:31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(97)00037-6
Pimentel, D.; Harvey, C.R.; Resosudarmo, P.; Sinclair, K.; Kurz, D.; McNair, M.; Crist, S.; Shpritz, L.; Fitton, L.; Saffouri, R. y Blair, R. (1995). «Environmental and Economics Cost of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits». Science, 267:1117-1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5201.1117
Poudel, D.D.; Midmore, D.J., y West, L.T. (1999). «Erosion and Productivity of Vegetable System on Sloping Volcanic Ash-Derived Philippine Soils». Soil Science Society American Journal, 63:1366-1376. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351366x
Shiferaw, B. y Holden, S. T. (1998). «Resource degradation and adoption of land conservation technologies in the Ethiopian Highlands: A case study in Andit Tid, North Shewa». Agricultural Economics, 18:233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00036-X
Shively, G.E. (1997). «Consumption risk, farm characteristics and soil conservation adoption among low-income farmers in the Philippines». Agricultural Economics, 17:165-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(97)00023-6
Shukla, A.; Dubey, B., y Shukla, J. B. (1996). «Effect of environmentally degraded soil on crop yield: the role of conservation». Ecological Modelling, 86:235-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00057-7
Walters, B.B.; Cadelina, A.; Cardano, A., y Visitacion, E. (1999). «Community history and rural development: why some farmers participate more readily than others». Agricultural Systems, 59: 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00003-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License